• Graduate program
  • Research
  • Summer School
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
  • Magazine
Home | Events Archive | Busy Season and Proxy Recommendations
Seminar

Busy Season and Proxy Recommendations


  • Location
    Online
  • Date and time

    October 28, 2020
    15:00 - 16:00

The short period of time, from the fourth week of April to the end of May, referred to as the proxy season has about 331 proposals voted a day relative to 27 proposals voted per day outside the proxy season. The compressed workload results in 17.6% fewer negative recommendations from ISS during this busy period. The proxy season also entails busy voting schedules for institutional investors who respond by increasing their reliance on ISS recommendations. Aggregate support for proposals with a negative recommendation from ISS is 10% lower during the busy period. Stock price reaction to vote outcomes in close elections show that successful negative recommendations during the busy period, that is when negative proposals fail, are associated with a reduction in firm value. In sum, ISS recommendations during busy voting periods are less likely to be negative, have greater influence on voting, and are associated with lower firm value. The results inform the policy debate on the role and influence of proxy advisors. Joint paper with Paul Calluzzo.

Read full paper here.